Drawing for ANYTHING ELSE IS A COMPROMISE

USPTO serial 78664085

ANYTHING ELSE IS A COMPROMISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANYTHING ELSE IS A COMPROMISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lucy B. Arant

Lucy B. Arant Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, LLP11377 WEST OLYMPIC BOULEVARDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1683UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Vitamin and mineral feed supplement for birdsACTIVE—
011Fluorescent lights, electric lights, electric heaters for pet habitats, aquariums, terrariums and cages; electronic internal terrarium waterfallACTIVE—
016Books and magazines concerning pet health and pet careACTIVE—
021Compact trapping unit for capturing live insects for use as pet food or for educational purposes, such as school projectsACTIVE—
031Canned pet foodACTIVE—
035Wholesale ordering services in the field of reptile food and care productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 30, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 30, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance