Drawing for WORLD BASEBALL CLASSIC

USPTO serial 78664370

WORLD BASEBALL CLASSIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORLD BASEBALL CLASSIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary L. Kevlin

MARY L KEVLIN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical and scientific apparatus, namely, radios; pre-recorded videotapes relating to baseball, pre-recorded videodiscs relating to baseball; pre-recorded audio discs relating to baseball; compact disc cases; eyeglass cases, cases for personal digital assistants, cell phones, cell phone accessories, namely, cases and face plate covers; binoculars; calculators; photographic cameras; electric switch plate covers; luminous signs, neon signs; sunglasses; decorative magnets; protective helmets, baseball batting helmets, catcher's helmets; video and computer game cartridges, video and computer game discs, video and computer game cassettes and video game controllers; computer accessories, namely, mouse pads and wrist pads, computer software, namely, screen savers, computer game programs, computer game programs downloadable from a global computer network in the field of baseballACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 16, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 16, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 18, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 26, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 29, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 29, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 3, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 20, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance