Drawing for THE PODSHOP

USPTO serial 78664429

THE PODSHOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PODSHOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph T. Leone

JOSEPH T LEONE DEWITT ROSS & STEVENS SC8000 EXCELSIOR DR STE 401MADISON, WI 53717-1914UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store and mail order catalog services featuring portable and handheld digital electronic devices for recording, organizing, transmitting, manipulating, and reviewing data, audio, video, and multimedia files, and accessories thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 8, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 7, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 24, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 20, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance