Drawing for UCB - THE EPILEPSY COMPANY

USPTO serial 78664480

UCB - THE EPILEPSY COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UCB - THE EPILEPSY COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael R. Davis, Matthew M. Jacob, Warren M. Cheek, Nils Pedersen, Charles R. Watts, Michael S. Huppert, and Jeffrey R. Filipek

JEFFREY R FILIPEK WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK LLP2033 K ST STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations and substances for the treatment of epilepsyACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely providing classes, seminars, workshops in the field of epilepsy; educational services, namely, conducting programs in the field of epilepsyACTIVE—
042Scientific services, namely scientific investigations for medical purposes; scientific and medical research in the field of epilepsyACTIVE—
044Medical servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 22, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 22, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 31, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 13, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2006AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance