USPTO serial 78665023
KINETIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4016715Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 23, 2011
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KINETIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seattle, WA
Seattle, WA
Seattle, WA
Seattle, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad R. Frazer
KINETIX LIVING CORP3300 1ST AVENUE SSUITE 300SEATTLE, WA 98134Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary supplements; nutritional supplements; dietary drink mixes for use as a meal replacement; meal replacement and dietary supplement drinks; nutritional supplements in liquid, powder, and bar form, designed to help fulfill dietary requirements; nutritional supplement bars; nutritional shakes for use as a meal substitute; nutritional meal replacement products, namely, meal replacement bars, meal replacement powders, and meal replacement drinks | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2005 |
| 016 | Stationery, writing paper, envelopes, calendars, binders; stationery-type portfolios; journals for recording personal information relating to healthcare, nutrition, weight loss and weight control; periodical publications and brochures, namely, magazines and newsletters that pertain to healthcare, nutrition, weight loss and weight control; printed training manuals, instructional teaching materials and cookbooks all featuring recipes, information and advice on healthcare, nutrition, weight loss and weight control | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2005 |
| 029 | Packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, poultry, fish, or vegetables; dairy based beverages; dairy based food beverages; soups, soup mixes; soy based snack foods; protein based snack bars | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2005 |
| 030 | Ready-to-eat cereal derived food bars; granola snack bars; cereal-based snack foods; packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2008 |
| 032 | Energy drinks; sports drinks | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2008 |
| 044 | Weight reduction diet planning and supervision through the use of counseling and creating diet regimes; providing consultation services in the fields of healthcare, weight reduction and nutrition | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kinetix Living Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Kinetix Living Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Kinetix Living Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Kinetix Living Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named KINETIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2013 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 19, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |