USPTO serial 78665761
CLOUD 10
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLOUD 10?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen R. Baird
STEPHEN R. BAIRD WINTHROP & WEINSTINE, P.A.225 S 6TH ST STE 3500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4629UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear for men and women, available for sale by Internet and telephone orders | ABANDONED | Sep 7, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |