USPTO serial 78666416
BRAIN CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAIN CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC, INC.
SANTA ANA, CA
CORELOGIC INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
SANTA ANA, CA
Other trademarks owned by CORELOGIC INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
CORELOGIC INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
SANTA ANA, CA
Other trademarks owned by CORELOGIC INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Leonard
Michael J. Leonard Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP2005 Market Street, Suite 2200One Commerce SquarePhiladelphia, PA 19103-7013Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for database management, namely, for receiving, analyzing, manipulating, responding to and providing data, creating databases, reports and documents; computer software for reviewing and analyzing loans, loan portfolios, and lines of credit; computer software for providing due diligence, underwriting, quality control and auditing on loans, loan portfolios and lines of credit; computer software for reporting on loans, loan portfolios and lines of credit, namely, through online reporting and portals on computer networks; computer software for centralized management of loans, loan portfolios and lines of credit; computer software for coordination of financial services, namely, due diligence, underwriting, quality control, auditing, financial analysis, document imaging and conversion to electronic data, automated valuation modeling, broker price opinions, fraud checks, name verifications, valuation management services, flood zone checks and ongoing performance surveillance; and computer software for embedding or interfacing the foregoing with third party software | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Computerized database management for data regarding loans, loan portfolios and lines of credit; Account auditing | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial analysis and consultation services, namely, reviewing, analyzing, providing due diligence, underwriting, quality control and auditing on loans, loan portfolios and lines of credit; Reporting services, namely, credit reporting services provided via the Internet or in hard copy; Centralized management of loans, loan portfolios and lines of credit, namely, providing financial loan consultation for others; Coordination of financial services, namely, providing financial due diligence and financial analysis; Fiscal valuations and assessments, namely, providing automated valuation modeling and broker price opinions for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, manipulating data and creating databases for others; quality control for others; Conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Identification verification services, namely, providing authentication of personal identification information; Fraud detection services in the field of loans, loan portfolios and lines of credit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Brain LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CORELOGIC INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CORELOGIC INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BOHAN GROUP LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BOHAN GROUP LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named BRAIN CENTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |