Drawing for BRAIN CENTER

USPTO serial 78666416

BRAIN CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAIN CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Leonard

Michael J. Leonard Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP2005 Market Street, Suite 2200One Commerce SquarePhiladelphia, PA 19103-7013

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for database management, namely, for receiving, analyzing, manipulating, responding to and providing data, creating databases, reports and documents; computer software for reviewing and analyzing loans, loan portfolios, and lines of credit; computer software for providing due diligence, underwriting, quality control and auditing on loans, loan portfolios and lines of credit; computer software for reporting on loans, loan portfolios and lines of credit, namely, through online reporting and portals on computer networks; computer software for centralized management of loans, loan portfolios and lines of credit; computer software for coordination of financial services, namely, due diligence, underwriting, quality control, auditing, financial analysis, document imaging and conversion to electronic data, automated valuation modeling, broker price opinions, fraud checks, name verifications, valuation management services, flood zone checks and ongoing performance surveillance; and computer software for embedding or interfacing the foregoing with third party softwareACTIVE—
035Computerized database management for data regarding loans, loan portfolios and lines of credit; Account auditingACTIVE—
036Financial analysis and consultation services, namely, reviewing, analyzing, providing due diligence, underwriting, quality control and auditing on loans, loan portfolios and lines of credit; Reporting services, namely, credit reporting services provided via the Internet or in hard copy; Centralized management of loans, loan portfolios and lines of credit, namely, providing financial loan consultation for others; Coordination of financial services, namely, providing financial due diligence and financial analysis; Fiscal valuations and assessments, namely, providing automated valuation modeling and broker price opinions for othersACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, manipulating data and creating databases for others; quality control for others; Conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic mediaACTIVE—
045Identification verification services, namely, providing authentication of personal identification information; Fraud detection services in the field of loans, loan portfolios and lines of creditACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 27, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 1, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 8, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 25, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 26, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 26, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 26, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 25, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 26, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 15, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 21, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 4, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 6, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 3, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 30, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance