Drawing for TOUGH GUY HAIR SPRAY ARE YOU TALKING TO ME?

USPTO serial 78668385

TOUGH GUY HAIR SPRAY ARE YOU TALKING TO ME?

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOUGH GUY HAIR SPRAY ARE YOU TALKING TO ME??

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda A. Kuczma

LINDA A KUCZMA WALLENSTEIN WAGNER & ROCKEY LTD311 S WACKER DR FL 53CHICAGO, IL 60606-6627UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003hair care products, namely hair sprayACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 15, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 15, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 16, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 4, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance