USPTO serial 78668700
J LOVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with J LOVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Incline Village, NV
Incline Village, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Ungerman
Mark Ungerman FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P.801 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW FL 5WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2615UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | HOME FURNISHINGS, NAMELY, flatware | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | purses and bags, namely, beach, carry-on, clutch, leather shopping, mesh shopping, tote, leather, hobo, messenger, shoulder, hand, coin, evening BAGS, AND backpacks | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | HOME FURNISHINGS, NAMELY, furniture, namely, sofas, tables, loveseats, armoires, hutches, credenzas, chairs | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | home furnishings, namely, dinnerware | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | home furnishings, namely, household linen, draperies | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, T-shirts, pants, sweaters, sweater knits, dresses, skirts, shorts, capris, tank tops, blouses, suits, jackets, coats, evening dresses and gowns, cocktail dresses, swimsuits, cover-ups, pareos, tunics; shoes, sandals, boots, athletic shoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of the Michael E. Love and Jacquelyne Piesen-Love Family Trust, comprising Michael E. Love and Jacquelyne Piesen-Love, both U.S. citizens
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of the Michael E. Love and Jacquelyne Piesen-Love Family Trust, comprising Michael E. Love and Jacquelyne Piesen-Love, both U.S. citizens
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named J LOVE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |