USPTO serial 78669426
SENSIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SENSIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Syracuse, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin C. Brown
KEVIN C BROWN BURR & BROWNPO BOX 7068SYRACUSE, NY 13261-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus and computer software for data collection and management; apparatus and computer software for data monitoring; apparatus and computer software for collection, preparation, compilation, storage, processing, retrieval and provision of business information; apparatus and computer software for conditioning, integration, management, reporting and archiving of healthcare data; apparatus and computer software for data archiving; apparatus and computer software for data integration; apparatus and computer software for data conditioning; apparatus and computer software for data reporting; data format and protocol converters; information management systems; apparatus and computer software for computer-aided transmission of messages, data and images; apparatus and computer software for publication of information in electronic form; apparatus and computer software for conversion of digital radar data output for legacy automations systems; apparatus and computer software for automatic dependent surveillance; apparatus and computer software for user-configurable analysis and reporting; apparatus and computer software for signal processor enhancement; computer software; surface movement guidance and control systems; management and surveillance systems for air traffic control; cooperative surveillance and data link system for air traffic control; systems which determine sensor configurations; radar stimulators; signal processor replacement apparatus and services; radar upgrades and services; radar processors; vehicle locating systems; systems for extracting and reporting weather contours from primary radar video signals; data monitoring and collection services; data integration services; data archiving services; data conditioning and data management services; data reporting services; collection, preparation, compilation, storage, processing, retrieval and provision of business information services; computer-aided transmission of messages, data and images services; conversion of digital radar data output for legacy automations systems services; business advisory services; publication of information in electronic form services; computer programming services; computer software design services; automatic dependent surveillance services; user-configurable analysis and reporting services; signal processor enhancement services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |