USPTO serial 78670191
RESIDENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RESIDENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-13881 Gemenos, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fred W. Hathaway,
FRED W HATHAWAY BURNS DOANE SWECKER & MATHIS LLPPO BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN PROGRAMMING ELECTRONIC CHIP CARDS, CARD READERS AND FOR APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT USING CHIP CARDS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN PROVIDING BUILDING ENTRANCE SECURITY, ACCESS CONTROL, AND ENTRANT IDENTIFICATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATA CAPTURE AND ENROLLMENT, DATA PROCESSING AND CARD ISSUANCE, CARD USAGE AND IDENTIFICATION CHECKING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND EXPLOITATION SYSTEM FOR SMART CARD READERS; ENCODING AND MICROPROGRAMMING SYSTEM, NAMELY, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; COMPUTER CHIPS; INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; PRINTED CIRCUITS; MICROCIRCUITS; MEMORY CARDS; MAGNETIC CARDS; ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT CARDS; MAGNETICALLY ENCODED CREDIT CARDS; MAGNETICALLY ENCODED KEY CARDS; ENCODED SUBSCRIBER IDENTIFICATION CARDS TO BE USED FOR SECURITY, ACCESS CONTROL AND LOCALIZATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN PROVIDING ELECTRONIC WALLET SERVICES THAT RETAIN PAYMENT INFORMATION FOR USERS ENGAGING IN ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS; ELECTRONIC AND ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS, NAMELY, SEMICONDUCTORS, SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES AND MICROPROCESSORS; ACCESS DEVICES AND ACCESS CONTROL DEVICES FOR APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT FOR INFORMATION PROCESSING NAMELY, COMPUTERS, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, TELEPHONES, AND ELECTRONIC READERS FOR ELECTRONIC CARDS AND TAGS; IDENTIFICATION AND AUTHENTICATION DEVICES FOR APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT FOR INFORMATION PROCESSING NAMELY, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, COMPUTER HARDWARE COMPONENTS IN A COMPUTER AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM, COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR USE IN A SELF-CONTAINED COMPUTER AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM, COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR USE IN A PERIPHERAL COMPUTER AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM, COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR USE IN A WIRELESS COMPUTER AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM; DECRYPTING AND ENCRYPTING PROGRAMS AND CIRCUITS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | USER MANUALS FOR SOFTWARE, ELECTRONIC CHIP CARDS, CARD READERS, ELECTRONIC TAGS, AND ELECTRONIC TAG READER | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF SELECTION, IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN, COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS INCLUDING THE EXAMINATION, PERSONALIZATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF CHIP CARDS, CARDS WITH INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, MICROCIRCUITS CARDS, INVENTORY CARDS, MAGNETIC CARDS, ELECTRONIC CARDS, WIRELESS SMART CARDS, PLASTIC CARDS AND BIODEGRADABLE CARDS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY, EXAMINATION OF COMPUTER-RELATED PROJECTS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELDS OF SECURITY, ACCESS CONTROL, IDENTITY, LOCALIZATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES; UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; RENTAL OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |