USPTO serial 78670415
ONEBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONEBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter S. Knezevich
PETER S KNEZEVICH LOK TECHNOLOGY INC181 METRO DR STE 580SAN JOSE, CA 95110-1374UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | US 021 023 026 036 038; G & S: COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR INTERCONNECTING, MANAGING, SECURING AND OPERATING LOCAL AND WIDE AREA NETWORKS AND TELEPHONY SYSTEMS; TELEPHONES; TELEPHONE HEADSETS; ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION DEVICES, NAMELY, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, MOBILE COMPUTERS, AND COMPUTERS; CELLULAR AND WIRELESS TELEPHONES; TELEPHONY SYSTEMS COMPRISED COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR THE STORAGE OF DATA; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR NETWORK SECURITY AND FOR COMPUTER SECURITY, NAMELY, FOR USE IN PROVIDING FIRE WALLS, VPN'S, DATA ENCRYPTION, INTERNET KEY EXCHANGE(IKEA), DIGITAL KEYS AND DIGITAL CERTIFICATES, NETWORK INTRUSION DEFENSE, AND/OR INTEROPERABILITY WITH NETWORK SECURITY PROTOCOLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |