Drawing for PROFITTALK

USPTO serial 78670943

PROFITTALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROFITTALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roy S. Gordet

ROY S GORDET LAW OFFICE OF ROY S GORDET98 BATTERY ST STE 601SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5529UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; a business communications system, consisting primarily of telephone equipment, computer hardware and computer software, for managing a business telephone system, answering incoming telephone calls, directing and routing incoming calls, holding callers on a call queue, and playing music or messages for callers on holdACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 28, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 6, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 18, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance