USPTO serial 78671156
M MAXILIM 3D OPTIMIZED MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3339314Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2007
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with M MAXILIM 3D OPTIMIZED MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SINT-NIKLAAS, BE
SINT-NIKLAAS, BE
SINT-NIKLAAS, BE
K.U.Leuven Research and Development
Leuven, BE
Other trademarks owned by K.U.Leuven Research and Development
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific, electric, photographic, cinematographic, optical, measuring, signalling, and teaching apparatus and instruments; namely computer software for 3D image-based planning and intra-operative visualisation of orthodontic, plastic and cranio-maxillofacial procedures, this software provides all the following functions-- image viewing and processing units, importing data from image acquisition systems, and exporting planning results towards other apparatus | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 14, 2004 |
| 010 | Surgical templates for the transfer of the 3D image-based planning during the actual surgical intervention | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 14, 2004 |
| 042 | design and development of computer hardware and software; design, development, and maintenance of computer software for orthodontic, plastic and cranio-maxillofacial procedures, imaging viewing and processing units, import functions from image acquisition systems, and export functions towards other apparatus | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 14, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MEDICIM
- Other trademarks owned by MEDICIM
- Other trademarks owned by MEDICIM
- Other trademarks owned by K.U.Leuven Research and Development
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named M MAXILIM 3D OPTIMIZED MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |