Drawing for TAKE BACK CONTROL

USPTO serial 78671186

TAKE BACK CONTROL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GENOVESE, CARRIE A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAKE BACK CONTROL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leonora Hoicka

Leonora Hoicka INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPNORTH CASTLE DRIVEINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & LICENSINGARMONK, NY 10504

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING THE OPERATION OF OR EXECUTION OF PROGRAMS AND NETWORKS FOR SERVER SYSTEMS AND WORKSTATIONS, AND INSTRUCTION MANUAL SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITHACTIVE—
016PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, INSTRUCTION MANUALS FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR SERVER SYSTEMS AND WORKSTATIONSACTIVE—
037INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER HARDWAREACTIVE—
042TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROBLEMS VIA TELEPHONE, E-MAIL, AND IN PERSON; DESIGN, INSTALLATION, INTERCONNECTION, TESTING AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN NETWORK COMPUTING, DESIGN OF COMPUTER HARDWAREACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 16, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 20, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 20, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 5, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 25, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance