USPTO serial 78672137
MS-T
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3888108Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 7, 2010
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MS-T?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RITZ Pumpenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG
Schwäbisch Gmünd, DE
RITZ Pumpenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG
Schwäbisch Gmünd, DE
RITZ Pumpenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG
Schwäbisch Gmünd, DE
SCHWABISCH GMUND, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda H. Wilcox
AMANDA H WILCOX HAHN LOESER + PARKS LLPSTE 3001 GOJO PLZAKRON, OH 44311-1076Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Pumps and accessories all for use in the municipal and industrial water and sewage engineering fields, namely, machine shafts for oil pumps and water pumps; hubs as parts of engines and machines for oil pumps and water pumps; shaft segments of articulated shafts as parts of engines and machines for oil pumps and water pumps; crank shafts for oil pumps and water pumps; shaft couplings for oil pumps and water pumps; clutches with gradual engagement for oil pumps and water pumps; clutches for oil pumps and water pumps; mechanical oil pumps and water pumps for use in motors and engines; mechanical oil pumps and water pumps and installations made thereof, in particular booster pumps, mechanical Archimedean screw pumps, mechanical ejector pumps, mechanical centrifugal pumps for use in motors and engines, machine parts, namely, membranes for pumps, lubricating pumps, mechanical vacuum pumps for use in the municipal and industrial water and sewage engineering fields; electric drive motors for oil pumps and water pumps other than for land vehicles and for commercial and industrial use; pneumatic drives for machines and engines for oil pumps and water pumps other than for land vehicles and for commercial and industrial use; parts of machines or motors, namely, oil pumps and water pumps and parts thereof for use in motors and engines, machines or motors for oil pumps and water pumps and parts thereof, transmission gears for machines, namely, machine wheelwork for oil pumps and water pumps; hydraulic controls for machines, motors and engines of oil pumps and water pumps; crankcases for machines, motors and engines for oil pumps and water pumps; control mechanisms for machines, engines or motors for oil pumps and water pumps; conveyors for oil pumps and water pumps; hauling engines and hauling installations made thereof for oil pumps and water pumps; hoisting devices for oil pumps and water pumps, net hauling machines, namely, haulage apparatus for mining, pneumatic transporters, pneumatic tube conveyors; turbines for oil pumps and water pumps; power-operated screws, namely, machine driven hydraulic power screws for oil pumps and water pumps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RITZ Pumpenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by RITZ Pumpenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by RITZ Pumpenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by ANDRITZ RITZ GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named MS-T
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 4, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 20, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 20, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |