Drawing for SOMÉT

USPTO serial 78672222

SOMÉT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOMÉT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David G. Boutell

DAVID G BOUTELL FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS PC2026 RAMBLING RDKALAMAZOO, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Transportation of passengers and/or goods by carACTIVE—
044Home health care services, namely nursing care, functional assessment program for patients receiving medical rehabilitation services for purposes of guiding treatment and assessing program effectiveness, preparation and dispensing of medications, on-call nursing care, interactive medical monitoring and alert service for reminding clients of medical information, namely, daily medicinal dosageACTIVE—
045Personal care assistance of activities of daily living, such as bathing, grooming, and personal mobility for mentally or physically challenged people; grief counseling; personal shopping for others; running errands for others; on-call concierge services for others comprising making requested personal arrangements and reservations and providing customer-specific information to meet individual needs rendered together from a remote office for clients living in their homes or in a long term care facilityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 2, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 10, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 25, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 29, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance