USPTO serial 78672397
EASY LIVING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EASY LIVING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC E GISOLFI
ERIC E GISOLFI SABIN BERMANT & GOULD LLP4 TIMES SQ FL 23NEW YORK, NY 10036-6518UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |