USPTO serial 78672480
NZMOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3457993Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 2008
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NZMOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Millersville, MD
MILLERSVILLE, MD
MILLERSVILLE, MD
MILLERSVILLE, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Taylor
David S. Taylor Berenato White & Stavish, LLC6550 Rock Spring Drive, Suite 240Bethesda, MD 20817UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Catalytic enzyme composition, namely, to reduce fungi and mold on common building materials and inside building structures, walls and HVAC ductwork | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 20, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |