USPTO serial 78672687
FOOD FOR THINKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AQUILA, STEPHEN DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOOD FOR THINKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PARADISE VALLEY, AZ
Paradise Valley, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan F. Ariano
Jonathan F. Ariano Osborn Maledon, P.A.2929 N. Central Avenue, Ste. 2100PHOENIX, AZ 85012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Health club services, namely providing instruction and equipment in the field of physical exercise, cognitive exercise, aerobic exercise and strength training; educational training in the field of health and wellness rendered through a program of physical exercise, cognitive exercise, aerobic exercise, strength training and specialized nutrition; organizing educational exhibitions in the field of community health and wellness; organizing community, small group and individual sporting events; personal training services, namely strength, conditioning and aerobic training | ACTIVE | Mar 29, 2007 |
| 044 | HEALTH CARE; NUTRITION COUNSELING; PHYSICAL REHABILITATION; PHYSICAL THERAPY; PROVIDING PHYSICAL REHABILITATION FACILITIES; HEALTH SPA SERVICES, NAMELY COSMETIC BODY CARE SERVICES; FOOD NUTRITION CONSULTATION; PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS AND NUTRITION; DIETARY AND NUTRITIONAL GUIDANCE | ACTIVE | Mar 29, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |