USPTO serial 78672974
SIMPLY SKIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIMPLY SKIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darren B. Cohen
DARREN B COHEN REED SMITH LLP599 LEXINGTON AVE FL 28NEW YORK, NY 10022-7684UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated skin care preparations and cosmetics | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | Medicated skin care preparations | ABANDONED | — |
| 044 | Spa and skin treatment medical services, namely, massage, hydrotherapy, hair removal featuring cosmetic and laser hair removal, sclerotherapy treatment of leg veins, cosmetic, plastic and reconstructive surgery, laser wrinkle removal, microdermabrasion, chemical peels, botox and related skin filler treatments | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |