USPTO serial 78673880
VORTEX COCA ENERGY DRINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3624694Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 19, 2009
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, MICHELLE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VORTEX COCA ENERGY DRINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Energy drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 4, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Amadeus Corporation S.A.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Amadeus Corporation S.A.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Amadeus Corporation S.A.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named VORTEX COCA ENERGY DRINK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 19, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |