USPTO serial 78673930
FRESH AIRPORT CONCEPTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRESH AIRPORT CONCEPTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Ryder Thomas
JOSH S BROWNSTEIN BROWNSTEIN THOMAS LLP220 MONTGOMERY ST STE 876SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and advertisement services; Advertising and marketing; Advertising and publicity services; Advice in the field of business management and marketing; Advice relating to the organization and management of business; Business administration and management; Business consulting services relating to product distribution, operations management services, logistics, reverse logistics, supply chain, and production systems and distribution solutions; Business consulting, management, planning and supervision; Business information and inquiries; Business information in the field of airport/travel terminal concession operations; Business management; Business management and advice; Business management and consultation; Business management consulting with relation to strategy, marketing, production, personnel and retail sale matters; Business management planning; Business marketing services; Business operation, business administration and office functions; Business research; Business research services, namely providing analysis of retail data on specific business locations; Business services, namely, facilities management of technical operations; Commercial business management; Concept and brand development in the area of airport/travel terminal concession operations; Concession stands featuring food, beverages, souvenirs and other travel related items for purchase at airport/travel terminals; Consultancy services regarding business strategies; Food kiosk services; Franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of restaurants located in airport/travel terminals; Management and operation assistance to commercial businesses; Offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of restaurants; On-line business directories featuring airport/travel terminal concession operators on-line listing, not on-line publication; Providing office functions; Rental of advertisement space and advertising material; Rental of advertising space; Retail outlets featuring food, beverages, souvenirs and other travel related items for purchase at airport/travel terminals; Retail shops featuring food, beverages, souvenirs and other travel related items for purchase at airport/travel terminals; Retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others; The bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods excluding the transport thereof, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |