Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78674682?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78674682. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns COTE PROVENCE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78674682, the listed owner(s) include: Mistral LLC, Mistral LLC.

What is USPTO serial number 78674682?

Serial number 78674682 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark COTE PROVENCE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover COTE PROVENCE?

The public record lists International Classes: 003, 004. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78674682

COTE PROVENCE

Q: What is the current status of COTE PROVENCE?

COTE PROVENCE (78674682) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Jul 20, 2005
Status date: Jun 1, 2009
Registration date: —
Examiner: ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COTE PROVENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Mistral LLC
San Diego, CA
Other trademarks owned by Mistral LLC
Mistral LLC
Solana Beach, CA
Other trademarks owned by Mistral LLC

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victoria Newland

Victoria Newland The Law Offices of Victoria Newland, APC338 VIA VERA CRUZ SUITE 250SAN MARCOS, CA 92075UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
003	body soaps, body lotion, body cream, linen water, shower gel, eau de toilette, perfumery, namely, perfume and cologne, non-medicated bath salts, incense, and hair lotions, namely shampoo and conditioner	ACTIVE	—
004	Candles	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jul 14, 2016	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Jun 1, 2009	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2009	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2008	EX3G	SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	—
Oct 15, 2008	EXT3	SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED	—
Oct 15, 2008	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 15, 2008	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
May 1, 2008	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
May 1, 2008	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
May 1, 2008	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2007	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Oct 31, 2007	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Oct 31, 2007	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 1, 2007	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 28, 2006	ETOP	EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED	—
Oct 20, 2006	CHPB	POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED	—
Oct 10, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jun 13, 2006	ETOF	EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED	—
May 16, 2006	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2006	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Mar 28, 2006	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Mar 24, 2006	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Mar 20, 2006	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Mar 20, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 14, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 14, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jul 26, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—