USPTO serial 78675186
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony F. Lo Cicero
ANTHONY F LO CICERO AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-1301UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, children's wearing apparel | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |