Drawing for LILLY PULITZER

USPTO serial 78675240

LILLY PULITZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LILLY PULITZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kaufman

JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER, & NE1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Golf bags; head covers for golf clubsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 21, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 21, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 20, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 13, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 26, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 26, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 19, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance