USPTO serial 78677794
H&D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with H&D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth S. Klarquist, Esq.
KENNETH S KLARQUIST ESQ KLARQUIST SPARKMAN LLP121 SW SALMON ST STE 1600PORTLAND, OR 97204-2988UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | dinnerware; insulated picnic bags; glass beverage ware; cookware for broiling, namely, spatulas, tongs, forks, basting brushes and skewers | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | tapestry throws | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | preserved fruit and fruit spreads; dried fruit; candied fruit; shelled nuts; dried soup mixes; smoked fish; cheeses; sausages; cooked, smoked and raw meat; smoked and cooked poultry; olive oil; fresh seafood | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | bakery goods; fruit syrups; cookie mixes; confections, namely, chocolates, candy, jelly beans, candy coated popcorn, chocolate coated popcorn, and carmel coated popcorn; coffee; tea; snacks, namely, cracker based snack foods and pretzels; sauces; condiments, namely, mustard; relishes; seasonings, namely, barbeque dry rubs; cocoa mix | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | fresh fruits and vegetables; living plants; unshelled nuts | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | liquid and dry mixes for making cocktails | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | hard cider | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | retail store services, online retail store services, and mail order services in the field of gifts, home decor items, foods, and flowers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Harry and David
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named H&D
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 18, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |