CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SPEEDMEDIA

USPTO serial 78677797

SPEEDMEDIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPEEDMEDIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith D. Moore

Keith D. Moore Video Gaming Technologies, Inc.308 Mallory Station RoadFranklin, TN 37067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for use in connection with monitoring gaming machines and unitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Mar 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 17, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 25, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 1, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 18, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance