CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DERCHE

USPTO serial 78682856

DERCHE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEPHENS, SONYA B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DERCHE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W. Douglas Hahm

W DOUGLAS HAHM WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK LLP2033 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1021UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, namely, face cream, skin cream, beauty masks, skin lotion, face milks and lotions, lip cream, make-up base, non-medicated skin cleansing lotion, non-medicated skin cleansing milk, non-medicated skin cleansing cream, non-medicated skin cleansing gel, soaps, skin whitening preparations, foundation make-up, face powder, bath powder, eye make-up, eye liner, mascara, eye brow pencils, lipsticks, cheek color, nail care preparations, namely, nail polish, cosmetic preparations for bath, namely, non-medicated bath salts, bubble bath and bath oils; hair care preparations, namely, shampoo, rinse, conditioner, lotion, hair creams, hair-dye, hair spray, hair gel and hair mousse; perfumery, namely, perfume, eau de cologne, eau de toilette, cotton balls for cosmetic purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 11, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 19, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 11, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 15, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance