Drawing for BEST NEW PRODUCT AWARD 2005 VOTED BY CONSUMERS

USPTO serial 78683820

BEST NEW PRODUCT AWARD 2005 VOTED BY CONSUMERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3331326Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 6, 2007
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with BEST NEW PRODUCT AWARD 2005 VOTED BY CONSUMERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard S. Levy

Richard S. Levy De Grandpre Chait LLP1000 De La Gauchetiere West, Suite 2900Montreal Quebec H3B4W5,CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing recognition and incentives by the way of consumer voted awards where companies enter their products and consumers vote on the best of the entered products to demonstrate excellence in the field of food, personal care and general household goodsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDAug 15, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Oct 22, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 1, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 30, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 30, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 10, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 10, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 10, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 24, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance