USPTO serial 78684118
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard W. James
RICHARD W JAMES LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD W JAMES25 CHURCHILL RDPENN HILLS, PA 15235-5108UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Image user interface software for medical and non-medical use, laboratory robots and computer imaging hardware and software for the capture and management of data and images for medical and non-medical use and for the handling of microscope slides | ACTIVE | May 30, 2005 |
| 010 | Medical imaging devices and software and microscope slide handling devices and software | ACTIVE | May 30, 2005 |
| 042 | Installation, support, maintenance and design of computer software, including image capture software, software for the transfer of images and image related data on networks, software for image viewing and manipulation, software to interface users to images and related data, and design of computer hardware, software, and electronic equipment and apparatuses for capture, retrieval and manipulation of electronic images and for handling and storing microscope slides | ACTIVE | May 30, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |