Drawing for SMARTWATCH

USPTO serial 78684408

SMARTWATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTWATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy B. Berge

AMY B BERGE GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC3500 NATIONAL CITY TWR101 S FIFTH STLOUISVILLE, KY 40202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016newsletters, brochures, and printed forms in the fields of managed and self-funded health care, health care plans, dental care, dental plans, vision care, vision plans, health, nutrition, wellness and lifestylesACTIVE—
035organizing and administration of health management organizations, namely, cost management for the health benefit plans of othersACTIVE—
036Underwriting, organizing and administration of pre-paid and self funded health care, dental, vision and prescription drug services and plans; health, dental, and life insurance underwriting services; electronic online underwriting, organization, and administration of health, dental, and life insurance; insurance claims processing and administration; administration of prescription drug programs for drug coverage insurers; organizing and administration of employee benefit plans, flexible savings plans, and medical spending accounts; organizing and administering pre-paid health care plans; administration of health, dental and workers' compensation benefit plans for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 23, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance