Drawing for GRAFFITI

USPTO serial 78684564

GRAFFITI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRAFFITI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert P Michal

Robert P. Michal Lucas & Mercanti, LLP475 Park Avenue South, 15th FloorNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for operating systems, modems, mobile computers, handheld computers, tablet computers, pagers and personal communications devices, namely, personal digital assistants, and car navigation computers; computer storage hardware; computer software for telecommunications services featuring wireless telecommunications services, paging, electronic mail, electronic recording, transmission and receipt of electronic data, electronic mail, digital and electronic communications, synchronization of data and voice communications; computer hardware and peripherals, namely, modems, mobile computers, handheld computers, handheld computers with wireless e-mail and access to electronic communications networks, tablet computers, pagers, personal communications devices in the nature of personal digital assistants, and car navigation computers, apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of text, data, images, sound and graphics; input devices, namely, computer mouses and keypads; storage devices, namely, computer hard drives, memory displays in the nature of LED and LCD flat panel displays; electronic book displays in the nature of LED and LCD flat panel displays; global positioning system receivers; telecommunications transmitters and receivers of the mobile, portable or fixed type; printers; battery chargers; styluses; digital audio players and recorders; digital video players and recorders; digital multimedia players; camerasACTIVE—
038Consulting services in the field of telecommunications and electronic communications networksACTIVE—
041Computer services, namely, providing an online magazine in the field of handheld computers and wireless devices; providing on-line publications in the nature of fiction e-books, non-fiction e-books in the fields of computers, computer technology and communications and reference e-booksACTIVE—
042Consulting and design services in the field of information technology, mobile computers, computer software, computer programming; installation, repair, maintenance and technical support for computer software and telecommunications software; providing search engines for obtaining data on electronic communications networks in the field of handheld computers; hosting web sites for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 2, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 28, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 7, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 4, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 3, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 24, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 2, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 21, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 21, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 17, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 3, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 3, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2007UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 6, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 1, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 21, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance