USPTO serial 78684681
SECURBORDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SECURBORDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY S. SOKOL
JEFFREY S SOKOL COOK & FRANKE SC660 E MASON STMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Machine-assisted biometric identity confirmation systems primarily comprised of cameras,and/or image scanners, and/or range finders, and/or presence detection sensors, and computer hardware, and computer software for automated target detection, target tracking and facial recognition to monitor, detect, track, inspect, identify and/or authenticate individuals and identification cards and documents; Secure pre-enrolled identity clearance systems comprising one or more of the following-- a) machine readable electronic and optical identity cards and documents and electronic and optical card and document readers; self-service user-controlled transaction machines/kiosks primarily comprised of cameras, and/or image scanners, and/or fingerprint scanners, and/or iris scanners, and/or microphones, and/or presence detection sensors, and/or electronic card and document readers, and/or optical document readers, and computer hardware and computer software for automated capture and recognition of human characteristics and or behavioral traits to establish or confirm the identity of persons and/or identification cards and documents; and machine assisted biometric identity confirmation systems primarily comprised of cameras, and/or image scanners, and/or fingerprint scanners, and/or iris scanners, and/or microphones, and/or range finders, and/or presence detection sensors, and computer hardware, and computer for automated capture and recognition of human characteristics and or behavioral traits to establish or confirm the identity of persons and/or identification cards and documents; Computer hardware, namely, electronic and optical card and document readers; Document authentication systems primarily comprising electronic and optical card and document readers, and/or cameras, and/or image scanners, and/or range finders, presence detection sensors, and computer hardware, and computer software for authenticating identification cards and/or documents using facial recognition by comparison of the biometric facial features of photos on the identification cards and/or documents or of the presenters of the identification cards or documents with biometric facial features stored on the identification cards or documents or in a database; Computers and computer software for clearing passengers crossing international borders by comparing biometric identity information of the passenger with biometric identity information stored in a database or on an identification card or document; Computers and computer software for enrolling biometric details on persons; Computers and computer software for identity verification, namely, confirming a person's identity by comparison of the person's biometric data to biometric data stored on an identification card or document or in a database; Computers and computer software for watch-list identity detection, namely, comparing a person's biometric data to biometric data of individuals stored in a watch-list database and identifying potential matches; Communication software for use in electronic communication with and between secure pre-enrolled identity clearance systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consulting services, in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others in the field of machine assisted identity confirmation systems, secure pre-enrolled identity clearance systems, electronic and optical card and document readers, identification card and document inspection and authentication systems, passenger clearance systems, biometric enrollment systems, identity verification systems, and watch-list identity detection systems; Product research and development services, in the field of machine assisted biometric identity confirmation systems used for automated capture and recognition of human characteristics and or behavioral traits to establish or confirm the identity of persons and/or identification cards and documents, and in the field of secure pre-enrolled identity clearance systems used for automated capture and recognition of human characteristics and or behavioral traits to establish or confirm the identity of persons and/or identification cards and documents, and in the field of electronic and optical card and document readers, and in the field of document authentication systems for use in authenticating identification cards and/or documents using facial recognition, clearing passengers crossing international borders, identity verification of individuals presenting identification cards and/or documents, watch-list identity detection,and in the field of biometric enrollment systems, for use in enrolling biometric details on persons; Design services for others in the field of machine assisted biometric identity confirmation systems used for automated capture and recognition of human characteristics and or behavioral traits to establish or confirm the identity of persons and/or identification cards and documents,and in the field of secure pre-enrolled identity clearance systems used for automated capture and recognition of human characteristics and or behavioral traits to establish or confirm the identity of persons and/or identification cards and documents, and in the field of electronic and optical card and document readers, and in the field of document authentication systems for use in authenticating identification cards and/or documents using facial recognition, clearing passengers crossing international borders, identity verification of individuals presenting identification cards and/or documents, watch-list identity detection, and in the field of biometric enrollment systems, for use in enrolling biometric details on persons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |