USPTO serial 78684973
BAROQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3364002Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 1, 2008
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BAROQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Bushnell
Robert E. Bushnell Robert E. Bushnell & Law Firm2029 K Street, N.W., Suite 600Washington, DC 20006-1004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | FURNITURE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 17, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2007 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |