Drawing for ENTREPRENEUR

USPTO serial 78685136

ENTREPRENEUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3520633Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 21, 2008
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENTREPRENEUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Perry J. Viscounty

Deborah A. Gubernick Latham & Watkins LLP650 Town Center Drive, Suite 2000Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded audio and visual media namely CDs, videotapes, audiotapes, and floppy discs featuring programs geared to business owners and interested members of the general public concerning starting, owning and operating businessesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
041Production of radio and television programs geared to business owners and interested members of the general public concerning starting, owning and operating businessesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDNov 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2013NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Dec 21, 2012NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
May 24, 2011NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
May 20, 2011C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
May 17, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 11, 2011C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
May 11, 2011ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2010NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Oct 21, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 17, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Sep 17, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 17, 2008OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 25, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 24, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 3, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 30, 2007IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Mar 29, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2007AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 22, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance