Drawing for DANCE MAGAZINE

USPTO serial 78685140

DANCE MAGAZINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DANCE MAGAZINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brendan P. McFeely

BRENDAN P MCFEELY KANE KESSLER PC1350 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10019-4702UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Tote bags, handbags, shoulder bags, backpacksACTIVE—
025Shirts, t-shirts, shorts, pants, sweatshirts, sweatpants, hats, caps, dance shoesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 11, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 12, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 11, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 26, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 4, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 17, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 30, 2007PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Nov 19, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 13, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 20, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 12, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 25, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 25, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 27, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance