USPTO serial 78686880
TYRA BANKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TYRA BANKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad D. Rose
Brad D. Rose Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture; bedroom and living room furniture, computer furniture, office furniture, lawn and outdoor furniture, bumper guards for furniture, carpet coasters for protecting furniture legs, fireplace screens, fitted fabric furniture covers, furniture frames, beds, bed frames, box springs, bassinets, furniture parts and partitions, furniture moldings, fitted fabric furniture covers, entertainment centers, wardrobes, buffets, drafting tables, cabinets, book rests, book stands, book cases, booster seats, high chairs, cribs, cradles, stools, foot stools, step stools, portable back support for use with chairs, mirrors, leather jewelry and accessory boxes, jewelry boxes and cases not of precious metal or common metal, non-metal money boxes, non-metal boxes, non-metal mail boxes, gift package decorations made of plastic, non-metal money clips, non-metal key chains and rings, non-metal dog tags, plastic key tags, key chain tags and key rings, plastic novelty license plates, plastic card keys, plastic banners and pennants, fans for personal use, hand fans, screens, tool boxes and chests, toy boxes, fixed towel dispensers not of metal, bathtub grab bars and rails not of precious metal, and bathroom vanities; curtain rails and rods; decorative bead curtains; non-metal window trims; free-standing non-metal tool racks, magazine racks, non-metal hat racks, coatstands, plate racks, storage racks, free-standing tool racks, wall-mounted gun racks and non-metal tool racks, picture frames, embroidery frames, leather picture frames, paper photo frames and picture frame moldings; plastic inserts for use as container liners; shelves and shelving, venetian and bamboo blinds; blinds of reed, rattan or bamboo; window blinds and shades; interior window shutters; decorative window finials; sleeping bags, mattresses and mattress cushions, air mattresses and inflatable mattresses for use when camping, nap mats, chair pads, chair cushions, chair mats in the nature of a pillow or seat liner, pillows and pillowforms; closet accessories, namely, shoe racks, belt racks, clothes bars, sliding clothes rails and rods, and clothes hangers; bath pillows, bathroom and shaving mirrors, figurines and statues made of bone, ivory, plaster, plastic, fabric, wax or wood; gazing globes; wind chimes; bag resealer in the nature of a plastic clip; wine racks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |