Drawing for DGATE

USPTO serial 78687083

DGATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KLINE, MATTHEW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DGATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Connie L. Ellerbach, Esq.

CONNIE L ELLERBACH ESQ FENWICK & W LLPSILICON VALLEY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware, software and peripherals for use in analyzing, maintaining and enhancing the security of computers, computer networks and communications networks, and for securely storing, evaluating and transmitting data information contained therein and manuals supplied therewithACTIVE
037maintenance of computer hardware and peripherals; installing and customizing computer hardware and peripheralsACTIVE
042computer services, namely, designing, and developing computer hardware, software and peripherals for use in analyzing, maintaining and enhancing the security of computers, computer networks and communications networks, and for securely storing, evaluating and transmitting data and information contained therein; maintenance of computer software; custom computer programming services; providing non-downloadable software for use in analyzing, maintaining and enhancing the security of computers, computer networks and communications networks, and for securely storing, evaluating and transmitting data and information contained therein; troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problemsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Oct 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 11, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 21, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 25, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 16, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 16, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 16, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 1, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Apr 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 2, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 1, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance