USPTO serial 78687668
MORTGAGE AMERICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MORTGAGE AMERICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Fields
SCOTT J FIELDS NATIONAL IP RIGHTS CTR LLC550 TOWNSHIP LINE RD STE 400BLUE BELL, PA 19422-2726UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real estate agency services; financial investments in the field of real estate; real estate brokerage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |