Drawing for MISSION IMPOSSIBLE

USPTO serial 78688052

MISSION IMPOSSIBLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3406796Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 1, 2008
Examiner
LUKEN, BONNIE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with MISSION IMPOSSIBLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott Martin

Scott Martin Paramount Pictures Corporation5555 Melrose Avenuec/o Sam JeffriesHollywood, CA 90038

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable interactive video games that can be played on handheld electronic game units and/or mobile telephonesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 5, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jul 8, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 25, 2008REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2008CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jan 8, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 28, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 28, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 30, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 30, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 30, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 11, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 24, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance