USPTO serial 78689716
PLAYO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLAYO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORTON J. ROSENBERG
MORTON J ROSENBERG ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CTR DR STE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043-4178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BLANK RECORDABLE COMPACT DISCS; BLANK REWRITABLE COMPACT DISCS; BLANK DIGITAL VERSATILE RECORDABLE DISCS; BLANK DIGITAL VERSATILE REWRITABLE DISCS; BLANK DIGITAL VERSATILE DISCS WITH RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY; BLANK MINI DIGITAL DISCS; BLANK MAGNETO-OPTICAL DISCS; COMPACT DISC CASES; DIGITAL VIDEO DISC BOXES; CAKE BOXES FOR COMPACT DISCS AND DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS; CD AND DVD DUPLICATORS IN THE NATURE OF TOWERS; PLASTIC CASE USED AS A SECURITY DEVICE FOR PROTECTING AND SECURING DVD'S AND OTHER MAGNETIC AND ELECTRONIC MEDIA FROM THEFT; COMPACT DISC ORGANIZERS; BLANK FLOPPY DISKS; COMPACT FLASH MEMORY CARDS; MULTIMEDIA MEMORY CARDS; SMART MEDIA MEMORY CARDS; SECURE DIGITAL MEMORY CARD; UNIVERSAL SERIAL BUS DRIVES; FLASH CARD READERS; TFT LCD TV; PLAMSA TV; MOBILE COMPUTING PERIPHERALS, NAMELY, PLAYER-OPERATED ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS FOR ELECTRONIC VIDEO GAME MACHINES, VIDEO GAME INTERACTIVE CONTROL FLOOR PADS OR MATS, VIDEO GAME INTERFACTIVE REMOTE CONTROL UNITS, IDEO GAME INTERACTIVE HAND HELD REMOTE CONTROLS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES; PORTABLE SPEAKER SYSTEMS, AUDIO SPEAKER ENCLOSURES, ELECTRIC AUDIO PLAYBACK UNITS WITH LIGHTS AND SPEAKERS, AUDIO SPEAKERS, LOUD SPEAKER SYSTEMS, SPEAKER ENCLOSURES, AUDIO EQUIPMENT FOR VEHICLES, NAMELY, STEREOS, SPEAKERS, AMPLIFIERS, EQUALIZERS, CROSSOVERS AND SPEAKER HOUSINGS, WAVE REFLECTORS FOR ACOUSTIC SPEAKERS, LIGHTING APPARATUS, AND AIR FLOW DEVICES; CELLULAR PHONE PERIPHERALS, NAMELY, CASES FOR MOBILE PHONES, DEVICES FOR HANDS-FREE USE OF MOBILE PHONES, DIGITAL CELLULAR PHONES, EAR PHONES, KEYBOARDS FOR MOBILE PHONES, MOBILE PHONE STRAPS, SPECIALITY HOLSTER FOR CARRYING CELLULAR PHONES; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, SPECIALTY HOLSTER FOR CARRYING PDA | ACTIVE | Jul 29, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |