CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ICCE

USPTO serial 78690072

ICCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wayne A. Sivertson, Lawrence M. Nawrocki, Richard C. Stempkovski, Jr.

Wayne A. Sivertson, Lawrence M. Nawrocki, Richard NAWROCKI, ROONEY & SIVERTSON, P.A.SUITE 401 BROADWAY PLACE EAST3433 BROADWAY STREET NEMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Neurostimulation device or devices for independently delivering stimulation through a plurality of electrodesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 8, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 8, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 9, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 15, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 16, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 13, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 9, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 11, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance