Drawing for ASH

USPTO serial 78690684

ASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cory M. Amron

Cory M. Amron Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPP.O. Box 2255IPLAW@VORYSColumbus, OH 43216

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Goods made of leather, animal skins and hides, and imitation of the foregoing materials, namely, clutch bags, attache cases, trunks, luggage, travel bags, knapsacks and backpacks, satchels, handbags, wallets, purses, leather key cases; and umbrellasACTIVE—
025Footwear, namely, shoes, boots, sandals, slippers, athletic shoes; and clothing for women, namely, suits, dresses, jeans, tank tops, under vests, underpants, socks and stockings, gloves, scarves, belts, knitted pullovers, shorts, coats, overcoats, and raincoatsACTIVE—
035Wholesale store, retail store, distributorship and mail order services, all the aforesaid services relating to clothing, footwear, shoe polish, shoe polishers, headgear, belts, key rings and key holders, wallets, handbags, sport bags, all-purpose bags and cases, trunks, luggage articles, watches and clocks, perfumes, cosmetics, eyewear, sunglasses, eyeglasses frames and cases, jewelry, ornaments for personal use, tie pins, bracelets, necklaces, fashion accessories, ties, scarves, mufflers, gloves, socks, hosiery, leggings, umbrellas; sales promotional and marketing services; import and export agency services; and provision of business informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 28, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 7, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 7, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 7, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 11, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 29, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 27, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 26, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 8, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 7, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 7, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance