Drawing for ZERO PLUS

USPTO serial 78691514

ZERO PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZERO PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Grant R. Clayton

Grant R. Clayton Clayton, Howarth & Cannon, P.C.P.O. Box 1909Sandy, UT 84091UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Antibacterial skin soaps; Disinfectant skin soaps; All purpose surface cleaners; Cleaners for use on surfaces involved with food treatment and preparation, biological membranes and food surfaces; Cleaners, namely, all purpose cleaning solutions; Cleaners, namely cleaning solutions for use on surfaces involved with food treatment and preparation, biological membranes and food surfacesACTIVE—
005Surface disinfectant, namely, all purpose disinfecting preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 17, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 16, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 29, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 17, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 17, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 27, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 17, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 17, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 17, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 2, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 7, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 7, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance