USPTO serial 78691958
AUTOMARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTOMARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and advertisement services; Advertising and commercial information services, via the internet; Advertising by transmission of online publicity for third parties through electronic communications networks; Advertising services for promoting the brokerage of stocks and other securities; Advertising via electronic media and specifically the internet; Advertising, including promotion relating to the sale of articles and services for third parties by the transmission of advertising material and the dissemination of advertising messages on computer networks; Dissemination of advertising for others via the Internet | PARTIALLY PAID | Aug 2, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |