USPTO serial 78691985
DISCOVERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DISCOVERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony V. Lupo
ANTHONY V LUPO ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5369UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts, tops, jerseys, sweaters, vests, shorts, pants, jackets, coats, sleepwear, socks, underwear, jogging suits, rainwear; headwear, namely, hats, caps | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Educational toys, games and playthings, namely, card games, action skill games, hand held units for playing electronic and video games, manipulative games, role playing games, model toy vehicles, toy model hobbycraft kits, and educational science and hobby craft kits comprising mixing containers and utensils, plastic molds, measuring cups and spoons, test tubes, rubber stamps, ink, paint, brushes, glue, stirring sticks, eyepieces and goggles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 31, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |