Drawing for SPIN THE BOTTLE

USPTO serial 78692290

SPIN THE BOTTLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPIN THE BOTTLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vince Amberly

Vince Amberly Litman Law3717 Columbia PikeArlington, VA 22204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Production of television programs; television entertainment services, namely, an ongoing television game show; production of television game show programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 17, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 17, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 3, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 21, 2007GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 25, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 20, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 23, 2007PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Jun 5, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 13, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 10, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 12, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance