CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CRACKED

USPTO serial 78693023

CRACKED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRACKED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul D. McGrady, Jr.

Paul D. McGrady, Jr. Greenberg Traurig, LLPSuite 250077 W. Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60601-1732

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer and video game programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 17, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 6, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 27, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 9, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 2010DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 23, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 17, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 16, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 15, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 15, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 8, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 20, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 20, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 20, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 17, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 22, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 12, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 7, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 6, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 4, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2007WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
May 2, 2007WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 28, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance