USPTO serial 78693197
PURE PARADISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURE PARADISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
REYNOLDSBURG, OH
Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
REYNOLDSBURG, OH
Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc.
Reynoldsburg, OH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS NAMELY BODY WASH, SMOOTHING BODY SCRUB, WHIPPED BODY CREAM, BODY BUTTER, BODY LOTIONS, HAND CREAM, ASTRINGENT FOR THE FACE, ASTRINGENT FOR THE SKIN, BATH BEADS, BATH OIL, BATH SALTS, BLUSH, BODY GLITTER, BODY MIST, BODY OIL, BODY SCRUB, BODY WASH, BUBBLE BATH, COLOGNE, CREAM FOR THE BODY, CREAM FOR THE CUTICLES, CREAM FOR THE EYES, CREAM FOR THE FACE, CREAM FOR THE FEET, CREAM FOR THE HANDS, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, EXFOLIATING PREPARATIONS FOR THE SKIN, EYE GELS, EYE MAKEUP PENCILS, EYE MASKS, EYE SHADOW, FACE HIGHLIGHTER, FACE MASKS, FACE MIST, FACE SCRUB, NON-MEDICATED FOOT SOAKS, FACE TONERS, FOUNDATION, FRAGRANT BODY SPLASH, FRAGRANT BODY MIST, HAIR CONDITIONER, HAIR HIGHLIGHTER, HAIR RINSES, HAIR SHAMPOO, HAIR SPRAY, HAIR STRAIGHTENING PREPARATIONS, HAIR STYLING GEL, HAIR STYLING MOUSSE, LOTION FOR THE BODY, LOTION FOR THE FACE, LOTION FOR THE FEET, LOTION FOR THE HANDS, LIP BALM, LIP GLOSS, LIP LINER, LIP MAKEUP PENCILS, LIPSTICK, MAKEUP FOR THE BODY, MAKEUP FOR THE FACE, MAKEUP REMOVER, MASCARA, MASSAGE CREAM, MASSAGE LOTION, MASSAGE OIL, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, NAIL STENCILS, NON-MEDICATED BLEMISH STICK, NON-MEDICATED CLEANSER FOR THE FACE, NON-MEDICATED FOOT SPRAY, NON-MEDICATED MASSAGE OINTMENT, OIL BLOTTING SHEETS FOR THE SKIN, PERFUME, POWDER FOR THE BODY, POWDER FOR THE FACE, POWDER FOR THE FEET, PUMICE STONES FOR PERSONAL USE, SALT SCRUBS FOR THE SKIN, SHAVING CREAM, SHAVING GELS, SHOWER CREAM, SHOWER GEL, SKIN BRONZING CREAM, SOAP FOR THE BODY, SOAP FOR THE FACE, SOAP FOR THE HANDS, SUN BLOCK FOR THE BODY, SUN BLOCK FOR THE FACE, SUNTAN LOTION FOR THE BODY, SUNTAN LOTION FOR THE FACE, SUNLESS TANNING LOTION FOR THE BODY, SUNLESS TANNING LOTION FOR THE FACE, PRE-SUNTANNING LOTION FOR THE BODY, PRE-SUNTANNING LOTION FOR THE FACE, POST-SUNTANNING LOTION FOR THE BODY, POST-SUNTANNING LOTION FOR THE FACE, TOILET SOAPS, HAIR SHAMPOOS; PERSONAL FRAGRANCES, NAMELY COLOGNE, PERFUME, TOILET WATER, AND ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; BATH POWDER, NON-MEDICATED FOOT POWDER, BODY POWDER; BATH, HAND AND BODY LOTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | retail store services, mail order catalog services and on-line retail store services featuring personal care products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named PURE PARADISE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |